Eligibility criteria
Well positioned to advance the endeavor
Whether you are well positioned to advance your endeavor (Dhanasar prong two).
What USCIS is questioning
- Whether your education, skills, record of success, plans, progress, and outside interest show that you are well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor.[1,2]
The legal standard
- Matter of Dhanasar lists factors including education, skills, knowledge, a record of success in related efforts, a model or plan, progress toward the endeavor, and interest from potential customers, users, investors, or others. Petitioners need not show the endeavor is more likely than not to succeed.[1]
- The Policy Manual adds that an advanced STEM degree, especially a Ph.D., that is tied to the endeavor and related to work furthering a critical and emerging technology or another STEM area important to U.S. competitiveness or national security is an especially positive factor, weighed along with other evidence, but a degree alone is not enough; letters and business plans should be supported by independent evidence; and the more integral you are to the endeavor, the stronger the case.[2]
How the request usually reads
- Interpretation An RFE on this issue typically says the record does not connect your past achievements to the proposed endeavor, or lacks evidence of a plan, progress, or outside interest.[2,3]
Evidence petitioners often provide
- Interpretation Degrees and licenses; patents or other intellectual property; citation history or published discussion of your work; a plan for continuing the work in the United States; correspondence from potential customers, users, or investors; investment or grants; and contracts or licenses showing use of your work.[2]
Where responses go wrong
AAO decisions on this issue
- Matter of Dhanasar, 26 I&N Dec. 884 (AAO 2016)
Petitioners do not have to show the endeavor is more likely than not to succeed, but must show by a preponderance of the evidence that they are well positioned to advance it.
This information is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship and does not predict the outcome of any individual case.
Sources
- 1.Matter of Dhanasar, 26 I&N Dec. 884 (AAO 2016)USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (published in DOJ EOIR Virtual Law Library) · AAO decision · Published Dec 27, 2016 · Checked Sep 27, 2026
- 2.USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 5 — Advanced Degree or Exceptional AbilityUSCIS · USCIS Policy Manual · Checked Sep 27, 2026
- 3.USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 1, Part E, Chapter 6 - EvidenceUSCIS · USCIS Policy Manual · Checked Sep 27, 2026