Staffing and organization
Staffing and structure
Whether the company's staff and structure can support a role that is mainly managerial or executive.
What USCIS is questioning
The legal standard
- When staffing is a factor, USCIS must consider the organization's reasonable needs in light of its overall purpose and stage of development, and no one qualifies merely because of headcount (INA 101(a)(44)(C); 8 CFR 204.5(j)(4)(ii)).[1,5]
- The petitioner has the burden to show the company's reasonable needs; officers shouldn't apply their own unsupported view of standard business practice.[2]
- Under Matter of Z-A-, officers weigh the whole record, including related entities in the qualifying organization, when looking at staffing.[6]
How the request usually reads
- Interpretation RFEs on staffing usually ask for a list of all employees at filing with titles, duties, pay and hours, and ask how the business's operational tasks are covered.[2,3,4,7]
- Interpretation When the company relies on contractors or staff abroad, they typically ask for contracts, invoices or other proof of what those people do for the U.S. business.[6]
Evidence petitioners often provide
- Interpretation Payroll summaries and state quarterly wage reports covering the filing date.[8,9]
- Interpretation Contractor agreements and invoices, and evidence of support from staff of the parent or affiliates.[6]
- Interpretation A business description explaining what the company sells or provides and why its structure fits its stage of development.[2]
Where responses go wrong
AAO decisions on this issue
- Matter of Z-A-, Inc., Adopted Decision 2016-02 (AAO Apr. 14, 2016)
When staffing levels are considered, officers must account for the reasonable needs of the organization as a whole, including related entities, in light of its purpose and stage of development.
- AAO non-precedent decision, Form I-140 multinational manager or executive, In Re: 39666475 (Oct. 7, 2025)
A motion was dismissed where job offer letters dated after filing, changing job descriptions and two different W-2s for the same year failed to show staffing that supported an executive role.
This information is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship and does not predict the outcome of any individual case.
Sources
- 1.8 U.S.C. 1101 (INA 101) - Definitions, incl. 101(a)(15)(E), (H), (L), 101(a)(44), 101(a)(45)U.S. House of Representatives, Office of the Law Revision Counsel · Statute · Checked Sep 27, 2026
- 2.USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 4 — Multinational Executive or ManagerUSCIS · USCIS Policy Manual · Checked Sep 27, 2026
- 3.8 CFR 103.2 - Submission and adjudication of benefit requestseCFR (Office of the Federal Register) · Regulation · Checked Sep 27, 2026
- 4.AAO non-precedent decision, Form I-140 multinational manager or executive, In Re: 41372977 (Feb. 26, 2026)USCIS Administrative Appeals Office · AAO decision · Published Feb 26, 2026 · Checked Sep 27, 2026
- 5.8 CFR 204.5 - Petitions for employment-based immigrantseCFR (Office of the Federal Register) · Regulation · Checked Sep 27, 2026
- 6.Matter of Z-A-, Inc., Adopted Decision 2016-02 (AAO Apr. 14, 2016)USCIS Administrative Appeals Office · AAO decision · Published Apr 14, 2016 · Checked Sep 27, 2026
- 7.AAO non-precedent decision, Form I-140 multinational manager or executive, In Re: 37676082 (June 12, 2025)USCIS Administrative Appeals Office · AAO decision · Published Jun 12, 2025 · Checked Sep 27, 2026
- 8.USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part E, Chapter 4 — Ability to PayUSCIS · USCIS Policy Manual · Checked Sep 27, 2026
- 9.AAO non-precedent decision, Form I-140 multinational manager or executive, In Re: 39666475 (Oct. 7, 2025)USCIS Administrative Appeals Office · AAO decision · Published Oct 7, 2025 · Checked Sep 27, 2026