Specific evidence
Comparable evidence
Whether a criterion truly does not readily apply to your occupation, and whether the substitute evidence is truly comparable.
What USCIS is questioning
- Whether a regulatory criterion does not readily apply to your occupation, and whether the evidence you offer instead is of comparable significance.[1,2]
The legal standard
- 8 CFR 204.5(h)(4) allows comparable evidence if the listed standards do not readily apply to the beneficiary's occupation.[2]
- The Policy Manual says a general assertion is not probative, but a detailed, specific, and credible statement can show that a criterion does not readily apply. Examples include presentations at a major trade show in place of scholarly articles, or valuable startup equity in place of a high salary. There is no comparable evidence for the one-time major award.[1]
How the request usually reads
- Interpretation An RFE on this issue typically says the petition does not explain why a criterion does not readily apply to the occupation, or that the substitute evidence is not comparable to the criterion.[1,3]
Evidence petitioners often provide
- Interpretation A detailed explanation of why a specific criterion does not readily apply to your occupation, together with the substitute evidence and why it carries comparable weight.[1]
Where responses go wrong
This information is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship and does not predict the outcome of any individual case.
Sources
- 1.USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2 — Extraordinary AbilityUSCIS · USCIS Policy Manual · Checked Sep 27, 2026
- 2.8 CFR 204.5 - Petitions for employment-based immigrantseCFR (Office of the Federal Register) · Regulation · Checked Sep 27, 2026
- 3.USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 1, Part E, Chapter 6 - EvidenceUSCIS · USCIS Policy Manual · Checked Sep 27, 2026