Eligibility criteria
Sustained acclaim
Whether your national or international acclaim has been maintained over time.
What USCIS is questioning
- Whether your acclaim has been maintained, rather than achieved at one point and not kept up.[1]
The legal standard
- INA 203(b)(1)(A) requires extraordinary ability demonstrated by sustained national or international acclaim.[2]
- The Policy Manual says acclaim must be maintained, but 'sustained' implies no age limit and no fixed time frame, and a young or early-career beneficiary may still qualify. If you were recognized in the past, the officer asks whether you have kept a comparable level of acclaim since.[1]
How the request usually reads
- Interpretation An RFE on this issue typically says the evidence is concentrated in an earlier period and does not show that you have maintained a comparable level of acclaim since.[1,3]
Evidence petitioners often provide
- Interpretation Recent evidence across the criteria, such as current roles, recent awards, and recent citations, coverage, or invitations, showing continued recognition up to the filing date.[1,3,4]
Where responses go wrong
This information is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship and does not predict the outcome of any individual case.
Sources
- 1.USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2 — Extraordinary AbilityUSCIS · USCIS Policy Manual · Checked Sep 27, 2026
- 2.8 U.S.C. 1153 (INA 203) — Allocation of immigrant visasOffice of the Law Revision Counsel, U.S. House of Representatives · Statute · Checked Sep 27, 2026
- 3.USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 1, Part E, Chapter 6 - EvidenceUSCIS · USCIS Policy Manual · Checked Sep 27, 2026
- 4.8 CFR 103.2 - Submission and adjudication of benefit requestseCFR (Office of the Federal Register) · Regulation · Checked Sep 27, 2026