Specific evidence
Judging the work of others
Whether you actually served as a judge of others' work in your field or an allied field.
What USCIS is questioning
- Whether you actually took part in judging the work of others in the same or an allied field, not just whether you were invited.[1,2]
The legal standard
- 8 CFR 204.5(h)(3)(iv) covers participation, individually or on a panel, as a judge of the work of others in the same or an allied field.[2]
- Policy Manual examples include peer review for scholarly journals or conferences, serving on a Ph.D. dissertation committee, and reviewing for government research funding programs. The petition must show that the review was actually completed.[1]
How the request usually reads
- Interpretation An RFE on this criterion typically says the record shows invitations but not completed reviews, or that the work judged was outside your field.[1,3]
Evidence petitioners often provide
- Interpretation Invitations from journals, conferences, or funding programs paired with confirmation that the reviews were completed; appointment letters for editorial boards or committees; and departmental records for dissertation committees.[1]
Where responses go wrong
This information is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship and does not predict the outcome of any individual case.
Sources
- 1.USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2 — Extraordinary AbilityUSCIS · USCIS Policy Manual · Checked Sep 27, 2026
- 2.8 CFR 204.5 - Petitions for employment-based immigrantseCFR (Office of the Federal Register) · Regulation · Checked Sep 27, 2026
- 3.USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 1, Part E, Chapter 6 - EvidenceUSCIS · USCIS Policy Manual · Checked Sep 27, 2026